It's not to be mistaken - the match between Liverpool and Manchester United brings sweat and tears to fans of both sides, and almost as usual, there was controversy.
As all Liverpool and Manchester United-fans already know, the referee has been fairly criticised about decisions involving Carragher.
Here's some of the things written in articles on a site called The Republic of Mancunia, which obviously is a fan site for Manchester United.
One article begins like this:
"Jamie Carragher hauled Owen to the ground and as the last man somehow managed to escape a red card. Given that Nemanja Vidic was shown a straight red card for pulling Steven Gerrard down at Old Trafford last season when he wasn’t the last man, a decision which was supported by the commentators and press alike, it is odd that Andre Marriner, who surely had a Liverpool jersey underneath his black referee’s shirt, missed such a blatant red card."
To be honest, at first, I thought just the same after the game. But the fact is that with different referees comes different opinions. You can't use that as an example as Marriner didn't do that game.
Besides, if this person is bitter about the red card, it wouldn't make that a big difference if it were yellow or red - the fact is that Aurelio scored on that very free kick, giving Liverpool a 3-1 lead which would be very difficult for United to catch up.
Furthermore:
"A clear goalscoring opportunity was taken away from us (1), with even Liverpool fans surely big enough to admit that the likelihood is Owen would have scored from that position (God knows they saw him do it enough times for them!), yet our only consolation was a freekick. A truly woeful decision which cost us all the points today. Saying that, this is the referee who allowed Lucas Levia nine fouls without a booking and missed our two penalty shouts. (2)"
1) In my opinion this wasn't a CLEAR goalscoring opportunity as Owen had to run to the left to recieve the ball, then run far right to get a good position for shooting. Yes, Owen is quick, but running such a big curve and controlling the ball at the same time isn't that easy without losing ground to the other players behind you. So I think it's not a clear goalscoring opportunity. But I have to be honest - I believe that was a red card.
2) When it comes to Lucas and his tackles, I can't remember much of it, but this guy may be right - come to think of it, Lucas was involved in many tackles. On the other hand - what difference would it make if Lucas got a yellow card?
According to this guy, the referee missed two penalties as well. Which two penalties? The only situation I can remember is the one with Carragher's tackle on Carrick. The United players surrounding the incident didn't scream for a penalty, including Carrick himself.
Alex Ferguson said that the ref was pressured by the atmosphere throughout the game to make the decisions go Liverpool's way. In that situation, I think it was the lack of penalty claim from the United players that made his decision just as much as the atmosphere.
"Carragher ploughed in to Carrick in the box, bringing the man down and touching, yet not winning, the ball. Had Carrick not been brought down he would have happily kept possession in the box as Carragher did not play the ball out of his path. As it was, Carragher brought Carrick to the ground and denied him an effort on goal just yards out."
Though the ref had a good view of the situation, I believe it's a difficult decision as he most likely saw that Carragher was touching the ball in that tackle. That situation is very difficult to me, as there are good arguments from both sides: Yes, he touched the ball but didn't win it. The ball made its way to another United player, though, so I don't know if the ref was thinking advantage or anything...
But the last line claims that Carrick would have a shot on goal if it wasn't for Carragher. I'm not sure about that one as Kuyt was the one running after him and Johnson stood right in front of him when this situation occured.
"Fernando Torres took his goal very well and Rio Ferdinand will have to wonder how he allowed the Spaniard to get past him with such little effort. However, seeing Torres throw himself to the floor every time he was challenged reminded me what a relief it is not to have such blatant cheat in the team. Ronaldo, we wish you well, and whilst I don’t miss his diving, it would have been nice to have someone willing to have a go from the edge of the box today. I imagine Liverpool fans are happy to have a diver in the side if he scores vital goals like that though, just as we were with Ronaldo."
He is absolutely spot on here. Torres is a diver as well as a fantastic player, just as Ronaldo is. I was really pissed each time Torres went to the ground, and I simply don't like him for that. I want none of it.
"Their fans claim we will always be in their shadow, but after winning our 18th title last season and seeing their players celebrate as though they had actually won a trophy (something which has evaded them for years) it is clear the tide has changed. The last time I saw our goalkeeper run the length of the pitch to celebrate with our players was when Giggsy scored our second against Wigan the season before last, wrapping up the title. It seems as though just beating United at home is reason enough for Reina to do the same. Saying that, Reina conceded the title in mid-september, so it is no surprise playing United is his cup final."
Now this is pathetic! That is a bitter, bitter comment. Why the hell criticise Reina for running the length of the pitch to celebrate? Fair enough, there's a few goalkeepers that does that these days, especially in a league match. But this guy should've been a goalkeeper for Liverpool - a team struggling like hell in the league, going through defeat after defeat, and suddenly winning 2-0 against Manchester United in a game that could turn the tide (which it apparently hasn't, though), in a game that every Liverpool and United fan are looking forward to each season. Not to mention the fact that both teams at that point had ten men, United was pressuring Liverpool the minutes before the goal and the fact that N'Gog scored on United's huge injury time. Doesn't that sound like a huge relief for a goalkeeper in a game such as this? A guy that's passionately talking about how the referee ruined the match in a big game as this should definitely understand. He's just bitter.
This guy fails to mention the things that didn't go Liverpool's way, though:
Where was the penalty that Kuyt should have been given after Berbatov tore his jersey apart? And where the fuck did the whole FIVE minutes of injury time come from? I think one certain Alex Ferguson decided for rather than suggestion those five minutes.
The conclusion is - yes, the ref definitely wasn't at his best in that game, but the same thing can be said about Manchester United. I can't remember any other big chances than Valencia's shot in the crossbar and Rooney's header right on Reina.
But I should have the Owen situation in mind, though, which will be a neverending discussion.
tirsdag 3. november 2009
lørdag 18. april 2009
Bullshit times: Alex Ferguson feat. Sam Allardyce
Alex Ferguson once again shows his weakness by attacking Benitez verbally. This time, he's not alone - Sam Allardyce has joined in.
The episode which made these two managers reacting was apparently a gesture that Benitez did in the game against Allardyce's team Blackburn Rovers. In my opinion, it's a witch hunt, trying to find something they can blame Benitez for doing. Overreacting.
At 1:57 in the following clip, you can see which gesture Allardyce and Ferguson are referring to.
First of all - It is said in the media that Alonso didn't take the free kick like Benitez instructed him to do, but Torres scored anyway. This means that Benitez did that gesture against Alonso, meaning something like "Never mind" or something like that.
Second - Unless Sam Allardyce was actually on the pitch, this gesture wasn't for him.
Third - Both Allardyce and Ferguson critisized Benitez for the same thing in their respective press conferences that took place with one hour difference.
Fourth - Why should Ferguson even care, in a press conference that was supposed to be about the FA Cup semifinal meeting against Everton? According to The Times, Manchester United's press officer tried to cut Ferguson's talk about Benitez - without succeeding.
Fifth - Ferguson also critisized Benitez for calling Everton a "small club", which happened years ago. Speaking of rivals, when hasn't Ferguson taken the shit out of Manchester City at press conferences?
Sixth - Ferguson also reflects on how much power Benitez want in Liverpool, especially when it comes to transfers. The Times writes that Ferguson probably feels threatened and see himself in Benitez, as Ferguson has got a shit load of (not quoted by The Times, of course) power in his team.
Seventh - "Benitez has never done such gestures against me and he had never had the chance to do it" said Ferguson. Do I dare to remind him of the humiliating 1-4 loss against Liverpool at Old Trafford?
I certainly wouldn't mind reminding myself of it, as it was worth all those years of losses to get that win!
The episode which made these two managers reacting was apparently a gesture that Benitez did in the game against Allardyce's team Blackburn Rovers. In my opinion, it's a witch hunt, trying to find something they can blame Benitez for doing. Overreacting.
At 1:57 in the following clip, you can see which gesture Allardyce and Ferguson are referring to.
First of all - It is said in the media that Alonso didn't take the free kick like Benitez instructed him to do, but Torres scored anyway. This means that Benitez did that gesture against Alonso, meaning something like "Never mind" or something like that.
Second - Unless Sam Allardyce was actually on the pitch, this gesture wasn't for him.
Third - Both Allardyce and Ferguson critisized Benitez for the same thing in their respective press conferences that took place with one hour difference.
Fourth - Why should Ferguson even care, in a press conference that was supposed to be about the FA Cup semifinal meeting against Everton? According to The Times, Manchester United's press officer tried to cut Ferguson's talk about Benitez - without succeeding.
Fifth - Ferguson also critisized Benitez for calling Everton a "small club", which happened years ago. Speaking of rivals, when hasn't Ferguson taken the shit out of Manchester City at press conferences?
Sixth - Ferguson also reflects on how much power Benitez want in Liverpool, especially when it comes to transfers. The Times writes that Ferguson probably feels threatened and see himself in Benitez, as Ferguson has got a shit load of (not quoted by The Times, of course) power in his team.
Seventh - "Benitez has never done such gestures against me and he had never had the chance to do it" said Ferguson. Do I dare to remind him of the humiliating 1-4 loss against Liverpool at Old Trafford?
I certainly wouldn't mind reminding myself of it, as it was worth all those years of losses to get that win!
torsdag 2. april 2009
FIA ruins Formula 1
The FIA has once again crapped in their own nest.
I'm then of course speaking of the small incident of Hamilton and Trulli behind the Safety Car in last week's Australian GP.
I assume you, as the reader, know everything about this so I won't tell you what happened there and then, but Trulli was first penalised, and then Hamilton was penalised for giving faulse explanation. The penalty Trulli recieved was a time penalty of 25 seconds, while Hamilton now has recieved a penalty which excludes him from the offical results from the GP.
I know faulse explanations really should be followed up and get severe consequences, but what the hell is up with FIA, race track stewards and penalties in this sport?
Remember the penalty Alonso recieved after "blocking" Felipe Massa during qualifying for the Italian GP 2006?
Or what about the penalty against Michael Schumacher for passing both Kubica and Alonso during red flag in qualifying for the Hungarian GP 2006?
Who can forget the penalty Hamilton recieved at Spa last year?
Sebastian Vettel also got a penalty for not stopping his car after he crashed and was left with three wheels, when he continued behind Safety Car for some more than one lap, because Vettel could cause a collision or leave debris all over the track. Fair enough.
But do you remember Michael Schumacher coming out of the tunnel during Monaco GP 2004 on three wheel and driving all the way to the pits rather than parking the car outside the track right after the tunnel? Did he recieve a penalty? No.
What about the penalty Lewis Hamilton recieved for causing chaos in the first corner of last year's Japanese GP?
Did Hamiltion get penalised because he was a title contender, squeezing out both of his rivals in a race that really counts?
Then what about Ralf Schumacher causing the chaos at the start of the German GP in 2003, in which he had to retire and only recieved a fine of some dollars that he easily could pay as he was one of the most overpaid Formula 1 drivers of all time? After all, Kimi Raikkonen could win the title that year if he would have survived that corner and maybe take the few points he needed at the last GP that year to clinch the title.
But what about Rubens Barrichello this weekend, starting from the second position, making an awful start, causes mayhem for trying to get back up among the cars, taking second place and not getting any penalty whatsoever? Why, may I ask; WHY?
The FIA consists of nothing else but a bunch of wankers being inconsistant and changes the rulebook all the time. And I'm saying this despite not even being a Hamilton-fan! I'm neutral, damn it!
I'm then of course speaking of the small incident of Hamilton and Trulli behind the Safety Car in last week's Australian GP.
I assume you, as the reader, know everything about this so I won't tell you what happened there and then, but Trulli was first penalised, and then Hamilton was penalised for giving faulse explanation. The penalty Trulli recieved was a time penalty of 25 seconds, while Hamilton now has recieved a penalty which excludes him from the offical results from the GP.
I know faulse explanations really should be followed up and get severe consequences, but what the hell is up with FIA, race track stewards and penalties in this sport?
Remember the penalty Alonso recieved after "blocking" Felipe Massa during qualifying for the Italian GP 2006?
Or what about the penalty against Michael Schumacher for passing both Kubica and Alonso during red flag in qualifying for the Hungarian GP 2006?
Who can forget the penalty Hamilton recieved at Spa last year?
Sebastian Vettel also got a penalty for not stopping his car after he crashed and was left with three wheels, when he continued behind Safety Car for some more than one lap, because Vettel could cause a collision or leave debris all over the track. Fair enough.
But do you remember Michael Schumacher coming out of the tunnel during Monaco GP 2004 on three wheel and driving all the way to the pits rather than parking the car outside the track right after the tunnel? Did he recieve a penalty? No.
What about the penalty Lewis Hamilton recieved for causing chaos in the first corner of last year's Japanese GP?
Did Hamiltion get penalised because he was a title contender, squeezing out both of his rivals in a race that really counts?
Then what about Ralf Schumacher causing the chaos at the start of the German GP in 2003, in which he had to retire and only recieved a fine of some dollars that he easily could pay as he was one of the most overpaid Formula 1 drivers of all time? After all, Kimi Raikkonen could win the title that year if he would have survived that corner and maybe take the few points he needed at the last GP that year to clinch the title.
But what about Rubens Barrichello this weekend, starting from the second position, making an awful start, causes mayhem for trying to get back up among the cars, taking second place and not getting any penalty whatsoever? Why, may I ask; WHY?
The FIA consists of nothing else but a bunch of wankers being inconsistant and changes the rulebook all the time. And I'm saying this despite not even being a Hamilton-fan! I'm neutral, damn it!
søndag 29. mars 2009
Guitar Hero fever - how does this affect us?
The game Guitar Hero is now one of the most popular games on the market. Not only is it "just a game", but people take it seriously, competing against other people in the world on the same basis as the FIFA-series and shooting games like Call of Duty.
It has even been a Guiness Record to be the best when it comes to Guitar Hero. With the guitar part, that is. I wonder if they take the drums, bass and the vocals that seriously later on.
Music is a part of everybody's lives, and with people that don't even know how to play the guitar, this is the opportunity to live out their musical side, pretending to be a rockstar and actually "play" the songs they love. But how does that effect people?
I know how to play guitar and I love it. I also think it's an awful lot of fun to play guitar hero as well, especially with friends, because it isn't that serious compared to playing the real instruments. Me and some of my buddies used to bunch up to play the real instruments - guitar, bass and drums - and try to create songs. We don't do that anymore now that we have bought the Guitar Hero World Tour game, which is kind of sad.
And what I'm about to say makes me die a bit inside - I don't get motivated by thinking that we should continue where we left with those real instruments. That's because it's so easy playing Guitar Hero with my friends and so much more fun.
Do not misunderstand me - as I've mentioned, I love playing the real guitar, and it is very fun when you make songs with your friend on the drums and such, but let me tell you this - since me and my buddy moved our equipment down to my basement, it hasn't been used that much. It has become overshadowed by Guitar Hero.
I certainly do not hope people, kids in particular, get the impression that playing guitar or the drums is easy when they play Guitar Hero. And if they suddenly decide they want to try to learn one of the mentioned instruments, they get dissapointed and unmotivated by the fact how much harder it is to learn than they thought.
On the other side; like every other video game, really - kids' reactions and eye to hand-coordination really gets hard training with this game. But that isn't much to brag about, really.
I doubt the Guitar Hero game will die out fast. In fact, I think it will grow, maybe to exaggurated and ironic dimensions, like having a band playing Guitar Hero on stage for an audience. Maybe a Guitar Hero-like karaoke bar, where every visitor is allowed to play their favourites for an audience.
Speaking of irony and Guitar Hero, and coming to an end to this blog, if you haven't seen the South Park episode about Guitar Hero, you really should. It has so many points and hits the nail about the ironic sides of this whole game vs. real instrument. Episode 13 season 11, entitled "Guitar queer-o".
You are going to laugh to death and think deeply about what you just saw at the same time!
Cheers,
Espen.
It has even been a Guiness Record to be the best when it comes to Guitar Hero. With the guitar part, that is. I wonder if they take the drums, bass and the vocals that seriously later on.
Music is a part of everybody's lives, and with people that don't even know how to play the guitar, this is the opportunity to live out their musical side, pretending to be a rockstar and actually "play" the songs they love. But how does that effect people?
I know how to play guitar and I love it. I also think it's an awful lot of fun to play guitar hero as well, especially with friends, because it isn't that serious compared to playing the real instruments. Me and some of my buddies used to bunch up to play the real instruments - guitar, bass and drums - and try to create songs. We don't do that anymore now that we have bought the Guitar Hero World Tour game, which is kind of sad.
And what I'm about to say makes me die a bit inside - I don't get motivated by thinking that we should continue where we left with those real instruments. That's because it's so easy playing Guitar Hero with my friends and so much more fun.
Do not misunderstand me - as I've mentioned, I love playing the real guitar, and it is very fun when you make songs with your friend on the drums and such, but let me tell you this - since me and my buddy moved our equipment down to my basement, it hasn't been used that much. It has become overshadowed by Guitar Hero.
I certainly do not hope people, kids in particular, get the impression that playing guitar or the drums is easy when they play Guitar Hero. And if they suddenly decide they want to try to learn one of the mentioned instruments, they get dissapointed and unmotivated by the fact how much harder it is to learn than they thought.
On the other side; like every other video game, really - kids' reactions and eye to hand-coordination really gets hard training with this game. But that isn't much to brag about, really.
I doubt the Guitar Hero game will die out fast. In fact, I think it will grow, maybe to exaggurated and ironic dimensions, like having a band playing Guitar Hero on stage for an audience. Maybe a Guitar Hero-like karaoke bar, where every visitor is allowed to play their favourites for an audience.
Speaking of irony and Guitar Hero, and coming to an end to this blog, if you haven't seen the South Park episode about Guitar Hero, you really should. It has so many points and hits the nail about the ironic sides of this whole game vs. real instrument. Episode 13 season 11, entitled "Guitar queer-o".
You are going to laugh to death and think deeply about what you just saw at the same time!
Cheers,
Espen.
torsdag 26. mars 2009
The season is (almost) underway
The season of Formula 1, that is.
Let me walk you through the drivers that participate in the Australian GP this weekend!
Robert Kubica: This driver is known to be the first Polish F1 driver, the first Pole on pole (huh) the first Pole to win a GP and finally being the first driver to have a bigger forehead than Rubens Barrichello.
Nick Heidfeld: Will still speak the ztereotype german-englizh like he alwayz haz... He will also fall behind Kubica this year. I kid you not.
Sebastian Vettel: Have impressed ever since he first drove in Formula 1 and has been named "The new Schumacher". Yep, he is the new Schumacher. Except that he doesn't have seven world titles, god knows how many victories and is actually not unbearable and uncharacteristic - he is Michael Schumacher!
Mark Webber: Webber is starting his eighth season this year, still chasing after Chris Amon's record as the most unlucky driver of all time. "I have the potential to once again retire my home Grand Prix" he was quoted to say. I don't doubt you, Mark.
Lewis Hamilton: Hamilton's ambitions this year is to take as many victories as possible, the title, and be even more cheesy just to piss off fans of F1 all over the world in addition to those he already have pissed off. Like Ferrari-fans and spanish racists cheering for Alonso.
Heikki Kovalainen: Came one year too late to beat Barrichello's huge forehead as Kubica debuted half a year before him. Trying to focus on victories this year.
Felipe Massa:
Kimi Raikkonen: You can expect the same mumbling as every year, really...
Jenson Button: According to my predictions, he will go for "Overrated driver of the year" this time too...
Rubens Barrichello: The only record he really have is for most race starts. And the fact that he's still getting paid for his drives is outstanding. Kudos, Rubens!
Fernando Alonso: Might bitch and whine more about things this year, but I doubt it will be the awful AWFUL colours of this year's Renault... which he has a right to complain about!
Nelson Piquet Jr. Might actually win something this year.
Giancarlo Fisichella: Great chap. *yawn* Are you still here?
Adrian Sutil: If there's one chance for Sutil to show the world what he is capable of doing, he's got his chance this year. So show us a revenge smack in Raikkonen's diffuser while being in third place, please?
Nico Rosberg: One of many names of a second generation F1 drivers - Nico is the daughter... err... son of 1982 champion Keke Rosberg. With that hair I do not doubt he is born in Germany and not in Finland.
Yakuzi Nakajima or something: Will he continue proving Japanese stereotypes behind the wheel, or actually impress us this season? Watch this space... no, seriously, please continue reading.
Jarno Trulli: Without checking the stats fully, Trulli is the greatest Italian driver after Alberto Ascari, having scored one victory in 199 races. Well done!
Timo Glock: Useless fact from F1 Racing: "Timo Glock has fewer letters in his name than any other driver on the grid". Wow!
Sebastien Bourdais: Watch out for this guy: he can take out three drivers on purpose and not be beaten by other drivers as they won't punch a guy that wears glasses.
Sebastian Buemi: Oh god, not another Sebastian? The first swiss driver since... since... oh what the hell, I'm not an encyclopedia, am I?
Let me walk you through the drivers that participate in the Australian GP this weekend!
Robert Kubica: This driver is known to be the first Polish F1 driver, the first Pole on pole (huh) the first Pole to win a GP and finally being the first driver to have a bigger forehead than Rubens Barrichello.
Nick Heidfeld: Will still speak the ztereotype german-englizh like he alwayz haz... He will also fall behind Kubica this year. I kid you not.
Sebastian Vettel: Have impressed ever since he first drove in Formula 1 and has been named "The new Schumacher". Yep, he is the new Schumacher. Except that he doesn't have seven world titles, god knows how many victories and is actually not unbearable and uncharacteristic - he is Michael Schumacher!
Mark Webber: Webber is starting his eighth season this year, still chasing after Chris Amon's record as the most unlucky driver of all time. "I have the potential to once again retire my home Grand Prix" he was quoted to say. I don't doubt you, Mark.
Lewis Hamilton: Hamilton's ambitions this year is to take as many victories as possible, the title, and be even more cheesy just to piss off fans of F1 all over the world in addition to those he already have pissed off. Like Ferrari-fans and spanish racists cheering for Alonso.
Heikki Kovalainen: Came one year too late to beat Barrichello's huge forehead as Kubica debuted half a year before him. Trying to focus on victories this year.
Felipe Massa:
Kimi Raikkonen: You can expect the same mumbling as every year, really...
Jenson Button: According to my predictions, he will go for "Overrated driver of the year" this time too...
Rubens Barrichello: The only record he really have is for most race starts. And the fact that he's still getting paid for his drives is outstanding. Kudos, Rubens!
Fernando Alonso: Might bitch and whine more about things this year, but I doubt it will be the awful AWFUL colours of this year's Renault... which he has a right to complain about!
Nelson Piquet Jr. Might actually win something this year.
Giancarlo Fisichella: Great chap. *yawn* Are you still here?
Adrian Sutil: If there's one chance for Sutil to show the world what he is capable of doing, he's got his chance this year. So show us a revenge smack in Raikkonen's diffuser while being in third place, please?
Nico Rosberg: One of many names of a second generation F1 drivers - Nico is the daughter... err... son of 1982 champion Keke Rosberg. With that hair I do not doubt he is born in Germany and not in Finland.
Yakuzi Nakajima or something: Will he continue proving Japanese stereotypes behind the wheel, or actually impress us this season? Watch this space... no, seriously, please continue reading.
Jarno Trulli: Without checking the stats fully, Trulli is the greatest Italian driver after Alberto Ascari, having scored one victory in 199 races. Well done!
Timo Glock: Useless fact from F1 Racing: "Timo Glock has fewer letters in his name than any other driver on the grid". Wow!
Sebastien Bourdais: Watch out for this guy: he can take out three drivers on purpose and not be beaten by other drivers as they won't punch a guy that wears glasses.
Sebastian Buemi: Oh god, not another Sebastian? The first swiss driver since... since... oh what the hell, I'm not an encyclopedia, am I?
onsdag 25. mars 2009
Now we're talking!
Liverpool absolutely TRASHED Aston Villa this weekend, leaving Manchester United only one point in front (though with one game less played).
Liverpool's offensive play against Aston Villa was astonishing and for me convincing except the last 20 minutes or so, when the game was dull as hell.
And you have to feel sorry for Brad Friedel, wrongly recieving a red card for his "tackle" on Fernando Torres.
Yes, it was a penalty.
No, it was certainly not a red card.
I hope Blackburn protest so Friedel can play the next game. Guess who's the opponent? Manchester United.
Speaking of red cards and Manchester United, Paul Scholes AND Wayne Rooney both got shown off in their loss against Fulham. It was, in my opinion, a right decision by the ref to give Scholes the red card, but the second yellow to Rooney was rather doubtful. I'm sure Manchester United will protest and will have Rooney for the next game.
That's my view on the case. But it's now time for
THE WEEKLY "SIR" BULLSHIT FERGUSON'S OPINION!
According to the norwegian newspaper Verdens Gang, Ferguson claimed in a post match interview that both red cards was a mistake.
Ferguson said that the distance between Scholes and Zamora was too small for Scholes to react differently. With all due respect, "Sir" Ferguson, Scholes suddenly threw both his arms over his head realising that Zamora was going to head over him. And that's no natural place to have your arms unless you're trying to block a ball illegally or smash someone's face with your elbow!
Further on, according to the same newspaper, Ferguson apparently said "... but it's Phil Dowd, so what do you expect?".
If "Sir" Ferguson doesn't get somehow penalised for this quote, this would be outrageous! The FA would not be consequent and Ferguson will again get special treatment.
After all, the FA launched their "Respect"-campaign last season, trying to improve the respect to each other, with slogans like "Respect the ref".
If Ferguson doesn't get penalised, how ironic is that?
Liverpool's offensive play against Aston Villa was astonishing and for me convincing except the last 20 minutes or so, when the game was dull as hell.
And you have to feel sorry for Brad Friedel, wrongly recieving a red card for his "tackle" on Fernando Torres.
Yes, it was a penalty.
No, it was certainly not a red card.
I hope Blackburn protest so Friedel can play the next game. Guess who's the opponent? Manchester United.
Speaking of red cards and Manchester United, Paul Scholes AND Wayne Rooney both got shown off in their loss against Fulham. It was, in my opinion, a right decision by the ref to give Scholes the red card, but the second yellow to Rooney was rather doubtful. I'm sure Manchester United will protest and will have Rooney for the next game.
That's my view on the case. But it's now time for
THE WEEKLY "SIR" BULLSHIT FERGUSON'S OPINION!
According to the norwegian newspaper Verdens Gang, Ferguson claimed in a post match interview that both red cards was a mistake.
Ferguson said that the distance between Scholes and Zamora was too small for Scholes to react differently. With all due respect, "Sir" Ferguson, Scholes suddenly threw both his arms over his head realising that Zamora was going to head over him. And that's no natural place to have your arms unless you're trying to block a ball illegally or smash someone's face with your elbow!
Further on, according to the same newspaper, Ferguson apparently said "... but it's Phil Dowd, so what do you expect?".
If "Sir" Ferguson doesn't get somehow penalised for this quote, this would be outrageous! The FA would not be consequent and Ferguson will again get special treatment.
After all, the FA launched their "Respect"-campaign last season, trying to improve the respect to each other, with slogans like "Respect the ref".
If Ferguson doesn't get penalised, how ironic is that?
tirsdag 17. mars 2009
What a week!
For Liverpool Football Club, that is. After a stunning performance against Real Madrid, Liverpool won 4-0 at Anfield in the second leg, with a 0-1 advantage from the first one. Yep. 5-0 against Real Madrid!
Yes, they were two lucky first goals. Well, the first one I don't know. I think Pepe was falling way easily. Torres barely tapped him on the shoulders it seemed, but maybe the viewer didn't get the best angle from it.
The penalty wasn't a penalty at all.
But from there, Liverpool DESTROYED Real Madrid.
...less important - I celebrated my 20th birthday at thursday :D
If that wasn't enough, Liverpool's form continued in the Premiership when everybody expected them to play shite as usual, especially against a team like Manchester United at Old Trafford. But holy crap, what a performance yet again!
Keeper Pepe Reina fouled Ji-Sung Park after about twenty minutes to give away a penalty, which Cristiano Fucking Ronaldo put in the net. Reina did go to the right side, but couldn't reach it.
At 1-0 there and then, I thought that the race was over. Manchester United had after all won by a one goal margine the last... what, 300-400 games?
But thanks to our twelth player, Nemdsgnsdlgfndslnjaa Vidic, Fernando Torres could sprint past him after a bouncing clearence from Mrtn Skrtl (his name is fucked up anyway, so why waste time writing the other vowels?), to put the ball past van der Sar.
And if that wasn't enough, Captain Dive... I mean Gerrard, got fouled by Evra. Yes, I know, bitter United-fans may claim that it was a complete dive, but I disagree. Gerrard falls before he even touches Evra, but you can't disagree that Evra was waaaaay too late and clumsy.
Again Liverpool's twelth player Neasmkjasmndfka Vidic helped by pulling Gerrard down and begging for a red card, leaving ten men on the pitch for Manchester United. And if that wasn't enough, Ferguson had made all three changes right before this incident.
Just to make matters worse a third time, a brilliant Brazilian... no, not Lucas. What the hell are you thinking!? I'm speaking of Fabio Aurelio - gave us that goal we almost was garantueed before Nremsklamnflasjflaja Vidic pulled down Gerrard. In brilliant fashion. I was stunned. Old Trafford was silent, except the chewing big mouth of "Sir" Alex Ferguson.
I think that's the only time I've seen Van der Sar standing still when a ball is going inside the net, not outside.
Just to make matters worse for a fourth time... no, wait, let's multiple that with ten because of a certain fat Italian - Andrea Dossena (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!exlamationmark!!!!!111!!!) once again did the honour of scoring the fourth goal. And in what style! A beautiful lob against a Van der Sar once again standing still. Pepe Reina actually had the assist in this one. I laughed more than I cheered, actually.
It was so beautiful seeing the stands at 90 minutes half empty. I could just take a picture of it and hang it up over my bed, though it was a picture of Old Trafford - but remember this - it wouldn't just catch the half empty Old Trafford, it would also catch the scoreboard at the top left corner saying 1-4. Goosebumbs!
Yes, they were two lucky first goals. Well, the first one I don't know. I think Pepe was falling way easily. Torres barely tapped him on the shoulders it seemed, but maybe the viewer didn't get the best angle from it.
The penalty wasn't a penalty at all.
But from there, Liverpool DESTROYED Real Madrid.
...less important - I celebrated my 20th birthday at thursday :D
If that wasn't enough, Liverpool's form continued in the Premiership when everybody expected them to play shite as usual, especially against a team like Manchester United at Old Trafford. But holy crap, what a performance yet again!
Keeper Pepe Reina fouled Ji-Sung Park after about twenty minutes to give away a penalty, which Cristiano Fucking Ronaldo put in the net. Reina did go to the right side, but couldn't reach it.
At 1-0 there and then, I thought that the race was over. Manchester United had after all won by a one goal margine the last... what, 300-400 games?
But thanks to our twelth player, Nemdsgnsdlgfndslnjaa Vidic, Fernando Torres could sprint past him after a bouncing clearence from Mrtn Skrtl (his name is fucked up anyway, so why waste time writing the other vowels?), to put the ball past van der Sar.
And if that wasn't enough, Captain Dive... I mean Gerrard, got fouled by Evra. Yes, I know, bitter United-fans may claim that it was a complete dive, but I disagree. Gerrard falls before he even touches Evra, but you can't disagree that Evra was waaaaay too late and clumsy.
Again Liverpool's twelth player Neasmkjasmndfka Vidic helped by pulling Gerrard down and begging for a red card, leaving ten men on the pitch for Manchester United. And if that wasn't enough, Ferguson had made all three changes right before this incident.
Just to make matters worse a third time, a brilliant Brazilian... no, not Lucas. What the hell are you thinking!? I'm speaking of Fabio Aurelio - gave us that goal we almost was garantueed before Nremsklamnflasjflaja Vidic pulled down Gerrard. In brilliant fashion. I was stunned. Old Trafford was silent, except the chewing big mouth of "Sir" Alex Ferguson.
I think that's the only time I've seen Van der Sar standing still when a ball is going inside the net, not outside.
Just to make matters worse for a fourth time... no, wait, let's multiple that with ten because of a certain fat Italian - Andrea Dossena (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!exlamationmark!!!!!111!!!) once again did the honour of scoring the fourth goal. And in what style! A beautiful lob against a Van der Sar once again standing still. Pepe Reina actually had the assist in this one. I laughed more than I cheered, actually.
It was so beautiful seeing the stands at 90 minutes half empty. I could just take a picture of it and hang it up over my bed, though it was a picture of Old Trafford - but remember this - it wouldn't just catch the half empty Old Trafford, it would also catch the scoreboard at the top left corner saying 1-4. Goosebumbs!
søndag 8. mars 2009
My dream band (part 1?)
I'm not sure which ones I would pick for my dream band. A combination with the best drummer, singer and guitarist wouldn't necessarily be that great. What kind of music would be outcome?
It's just like Real Madrid or Chelsea - buy the best players, and see where you end up (woah, buuuurn!).
On thing I am ABSOLUTELY sure about is which drummer I would love to have - Reni from The Stone Roses. The rythms is absolutely brilliant, and in addition to do such extremely difficult rythms (at least for me, as I've never drummed before), he also has backing vocals at some songs! Incredible!
Listen to Elephant Stone or Waterfall, for instance!
It's just like Real Madrid or Chelsea - buy the best players, and see where you end up (woah, buuuurn!).
On thing I am ABSOLUTELY sure about is which drummer I would love to have - Reni from The Stone Roses. The rythms is absolutely brilliant, and in addition to do such extremely difficult rythms (at least for me, as I've never drummed before), he also has backing vocals at some songs! Incredible!
Listen to Elephant Stone or Waterfall, for instance!
onsdag 4. mars 2009
You too
I've strongly considered joining Facebook-groups such as "Bono is the biggest wanker in the world" without quite knowing why. I don't like the guy.
Sure, everything he stands for and does against poverty and such is just brilliant - we need that kind of persons! But there's something about him saying "oh yeah, I'm great and everybody's loving me". Besides, who the hell meets world famous politicians wearing pimped sunglasses all the fucking time? I don't think I've seen any pictures of Bono without sunglasses after the 1980's!
Though I actually like some of U2's songs, I don't like the band itself or Bono himself. I now have my excuse - just the same reason as most fans from Ireland has.
U2 decided recently to move all their money to the Netherlands to pay less tax. That means U2 don't pay taxes to their motherland anymore, which left many Irish fans insulted and gutted.
Bono has criticised world leaders for their use of money and such, and U2 moves their money to the Netherlands to save taxes, which seems greedy. Which then makes Bono a hypocrite.
They've also moved their studio to the U2 tower (what a cheesy name! wtf?), and had a release concert on top of the BBC building in London.
Actually, I still think Bono is a wanker. Except the things he stands for.
Sure, everything he stands for and does against poverty and such is just brilliant - we need that kind of persons! But there's something about him saying "oh yeah, I'm great and everybody's loving me". Besides, who the hell meets world famous politicians wearing pimped sunglasses all the fucking time? I don't think I've seen any pictures of Bono without sunglasses after the 1980's!
Though I actually like some of U2's songs, I don't like the band itself or Bono himself. I now have my excuse - just the same reason as most fans from Ireland has.
U2 decided recently to move all their money to the Netherlands to pay less tax. That means U2 don't pay taxes to their motherland anymore, which left many Irish fans insulted and gutted.
Bono has criticised world leaders for their use of money and such, and U2 moves their money to the Netherlands to save taxes, which seems greedy. Which then makes Bono a hypocrite.
They've also moved their studio to the U2 tower (what a cheesy name! wtf?), and had a release concert on top of the BBC building in London.
Actually, I still think Bono is a wanker. Except the things he stands for.
søndag 22. februar 2009
Congratulations, Manchester United!
You have now a clear track ahead to the title victory!
That's right, as Chelsea and Arsenal can't quite keep up with you, and though Aston Villa has been good breaking into the top-four-now-being-the-top-five, Liverpool was the only one having a chance to take you. Yes, I said was.
As Manchester United is continuing their lucky wins with one goal margins (especially 1-0's), Liverpool are struggling thanks to certain players and Benitez' decisions.
My critique against Benitez and his players is endless (and wasted). Benitez simply cannot expect players like Dossena and Lucas to be that good reserves to Aurelio and Gerrard/Alonso. Although both Lucas and Dossena is a step in the wrong direction, the only positive thing I can benefit from is that, as a huge Kuyt-fan, no critiques can be made against a Kuyt out of form when he's being oh-so overshadowed by the Italian train (always after schedule) and the most talentless Brazilian I've probably seen.
I mean, come on! We all knew John Arne Riise was on his way down and was over the top long time ago, but looking at the situation today, it would be way better to keep him than buying Dossena.
When it comes to Lucas - please, mr. Benitez - can you open your eyes and ears for fuck's sake?
Fine, he has more experience than let's say Plessis, which would be the only other option if both Gerrard and Alonso is injured like in the case today, but I would honestly think that that would be the better option. Why Benitez substituted Mascherano instead of Lucas for Babel today is a question we can ask ourselves for a long time, but not until the next strange decision Benitez is making - which is to be at the very next game.
And even if there's not an injury problem with neither Alonso, Gerrard or Mascherano, Benitez is still using Lucas! Benitez ALWAYS defends him when Lucas is getting critique against him, which I just don't understand. If someone's going to have to stay objective, that has to be the manager himself. Is Lucas paying Benitez money for playing or what?
Which brings us to Ryan Babel. What the hell has Ryan Babel done to Rafael Benitez to deserve a place at the bench each fucking game? Is that fair, Benitez? Using Lucas despite everything? Defend him and yourself despite everything? Then how do you explain benching Babel all the time?
I have no more faith in the team, let alone the manager. I'm utterly destroyed by frustration.
Liverpool Football Club can forget the trophy this year. Focus on Champions League. But beating Real Madrid is a hard one, so I guess there will be no trophies this year either...
That's right, as Chelsea and Arsenal can't quite keep up with you, and though Aston Villa has been good breaking into the top-four-now-being-the-top-five, Liverpool was the only one having a chance to take you. Yes, I said was.
As Manchester United is continuing their lucky wins with one goal margins (especially 1-0's), Liverpool are struggling thanks to certain players and Benitez' decisions.
My critique against Benitez and his players is endless (and wasted). Benitez simply cannot expect players like Dossena and Lucas to be that good reserves to Aurelio and Gerrard/Alonso. Although both Lucas and Dossena is a step in the wrong direction, the only positive thing I can benefit from is that, as a huge Kuyt-fan, no critiques can be made against a Kuyt out of form when he's being oh-so overshadowed by the Italian train (always after schedule) and the most talentless Brazilian I've probably seen.
I mean, come on! We all knew John Arne Riise was on his way down and was over the top long time ago, but looking at the situation today, it would be way better to keep him than buying Dossena.
When it comes to Lucas - please, mr. Benitez - can you open your eyes and ears for fuck's sake?
Fine, he has more experience than let's say Plessis, which would be the only other option if both Gerrard and Alonso is injured like in the case today, but I would honestly think that that would be the better option. Why Benitez substituted Mascherano instead of Lucas for Babel today is a question we can ask ourselves for a long time, but not until the next strange decision Benitez is making - which is to be at the very next game.
And even if there's not an injury problem with neither Alonso, Gerrard or Mascherano, Benitez is still using Lucas! Benitez ALWAYS defends him when Lucas is getting critique against him, which I just don't understand. If someone's going to have to stay objective, that has to be the manager himself. Is Lucas paying Benitez money for playing or what?
Which brings us to Ryan Babel. What the hell has Ryan Babel done to Rafael Benitez to deserve a place at the bench each fucking game? Is that fair, Benitez? Using Lucas despite everything? Defend him and yourself despite everything? Then how do you explain benching Babel all the time?
I have no more faith in the team, let alone the manager. I'm utterly destroyed by frustration.
Liverpool Football Club can forget the trophy this year. Focus on Champions League. But beating Real Madrid is a hard one, so I guess there will be no trophies this year either...
fredag 6. februar 2009
Injuries is the biggest enemy
Rafael Benitez really has a dilemma or two for tomorrow's game against Portsmouth.
With Gerrard as a positively injured player, and Alonso and Torres as uncertain ones, the worst case scenario would of course not feature any of these players. Besides the injuries, Lucas Leiva is suspended after the clash against Everton in the FA Cup.
Now as Benitez has sold Robbie Keane and Pennant is at Blackburn as a loan, the midfield-options for Benitez would be El Zhar, Benayoun, Mascherano, Kuyt, Riera and possibly Damien Plessis.
With only Mascherano and Plessis as the "real" central midfielders, Benitez may have to look at some other options and improvise. Who knows, maybe Benayoun will be used in Gerrard's part where he's right behind the striker?
The decisions about the midfielders will also affect the decision about who's going to be the striker. I say striker and not "strikerS" as I believe Benitez will continue his formation as he has done the bigger part of the season.
Even though both Ryan Babel and Dirk Kuyt is "originally" strikers but has been used as left and right midfielders, I think Benitez can't afford using these players as strikers. If that will happen, my opinion would be that Babel will be the one on top, with N'Gog as a substitute or the opposite.
Kuyt as a lone striker is no good option, as I have pointed out before in this blog.
That leaves Kuyt on the right side with Riera on the left, with possibly Benayoun, Plessis and Mascherano for the central midfield.
If Benitez doesn't feel he's getting the offensive play that he wants, I would definitely choose Hyypia in the defence as he is dangerous when it comes to corners and free kicks.
That said, IF Torres and Alonso would turn out to be fit to play... this post is pointless!
I'll end with a small LOL for that one.
LOL.
With Gerrard as a positively injured player, and Alonso and Torres as uncertain ones, the worst case scenario would of course not feature any of these players. Besides the injuries, Lucas Leiva is suspended after the clash against Everton in the FA Cup.
Now as Benitez has sold Robbie Keane and Pennant is at Blackburn as a loan, the midfield-options for Benitez would be El Zhar, Benayoun, Mascherano, Kuyt, Riera and possibly Damien Plessis.
With only Mascherano and Plessis as the "real" central midfielders, Benitez may have to look at some other options and improvise. Who knows, maybe Benayoun will be used in Gerrard's part where he's right behind the striker?
The decisions about the midfielders will also affect the decision about who's going to be the striker. I say striker and not "strikerS" as I believe Benitez will continue his formation as he has done the bigger part of the season.
Even though both Ryan Babel and Dirk Kuyt is "originally" strikers but has been used as left and right midfielders, I think Benitez can't afford using these players as strikers. If that will happen, my opinion would be that Babel will be the one on top, with N'Gog as a substitute or the opposite.
Kuyt as a lone striker is no good option, as I have pointed out before in this blog.
That leaves Kuyt on the right side with Riera on the left, with possibly Benayoun, Plessis and Mascherano for the central midfield.
If Benitez doesn't feel he's getting the offensive play that he wants, I would definitely choose Hyypia in the defence as he is dangerous when it comes to corners and free kicks.
That said, IF Torres and Alonso would turn out to be fit to play... this post is pointless!
I'll end with a small LOL for that one.
LOL.
søndag 1. februar 2009
Where's the offensive play?
Once again I have to write about Mr. Benitez and Liverpool. As a die hard Liverpool-fan, I am absolutely frustrated at the moment by the recent performance against Wigan and the poor performances against Everton.
I will point out the good and bad about Benitez choices, and I will try to make this short.
Good:
- Keane at the bench, Torres on top. Though Torres isn't at his very best at the moment, you have to use a player until he finds his top form. When it comes to Keane, he had his twenty chances and haven't found his yet.
- Babel and Benayoun from the start, though Babel hasn't really impressed. Benayoun has done his stuff and deserves to be among the starting eleven the next couple of games.
- No more Kuyt as a lone striker at the top. Better use of him at the right side, though Kuyt has been impressing as little as Babel.
Bad:
- The frequent use of Lucas. I know, Lucas is young and need to be taught and this is how to develop coming stars (if he will be one), but Benitez is taking huge risks when it comes to his inexperience. There's one thing Liverpool can't afford now, and that is to lose the title just because Benitez want to develop Lucas.
- Though we have world class central defenders in Carragher, Hyypia and Skrtel: Where's Agger?
- If we can't fucking score by attacking, why don't have Hyypia in the starting eleven and automatically have a heading specialist in free kicks and corners? Just a though...
(- Maybe team Torres up with a second strikes, like Babel or something? Torres has the technique, Babel has the fearsome shot)
My (preferable) starting eleven against Chelsea this evening:
Reina
Arbeloa
Carragher
Hyypia
Aurelio
Kuyt
Mascherano
Gerrard
Benayoun
Babel
Torres
I will point out the good and bad about Benitez choices, and I will try to make this short.
Good:
- Keane at the bench, Torres on top. Though Torres isn't at his very best at the moment, you have to use a player until he finds his top form. When it comes to Keane, he had his twenty chances and haven't found his yet.
- Babel and Benayoun from the start, though Babel hasn't really impressed. Benayoun has done his stuff and deserves to be among the starting eleven the next couple of games.
- No more Kuyt as a lone striker at the top. Better use of him at the right side, though Kuyt has been impressing as little as Babel.
Bad:
- The frequent use of Lucas. I know, Lucas is young and need to be taught and this is how to develop coming stars (if he will be one), but Benitez is taking huge risks when it comes to his inexperience. There's one thing Liverpool can't afford now, and that is to lose the title just because Benitez want to develop Lucas.
- Though we have world class central defenders in Carragher, Hyypia and Skrtel: Where's Agger?
- If we can't fucking score by attacking, why don't have Hyypia in the starting eleven and automatically have a heading specialist in free kicks and corners? Just a though...
(- Maybe team Torres up with a second strikes, like Babel or something? Torres has the technique, Babel has the fearsome shot)
My (preferable) starting eleven against Chelsea this evening:
Reina
Arbeloa
Carragher
Hyypia
Aurelio
Kuyt
Mascherano
Gerrard
Benayoun
Babel
Torres
tirsdag 20. januar 2009
What has football given us?
Football (or soccer for the ignorant people giving the name "football" to a sport that barely use the feet) is both loved and hated. Mostly loved. But very hated, or ignored by many people.
I've grown up playing football, and I've grown up watching and involving in football. But I can understand why some people (women in particular) hate football. Here are some reasons
- The money involved. It was speculated that the sheikh(s) owning Manchester City football club was going to bid 100 million pounds for superstar Kaká.
- The attention it gets. Media just can't get enough of football because people in general can't get enough of football.
- The diving. With all the diving going on around the world, the sport is being ruined from the inside.
- The fans. Such as hooligans. And especially women can't stand men screaming, shouting and crying over football, it seems...
But what good has football given us? For the women, the men stay fit by playing football. On the other hand, football has also given us fat sweaty guys drinking beer at the pub watching a game.
I've grown up playing football, and I've grown up watching and involving in football. But I can understand why some people (women in particular) hate football. Here are some reasons
- The money involved. It was speculated that the sheikh(s) owning Manchester City football club was going to bid 100 million pounds for superstar Kaká.
- The attention it gets. Media just can't get enough of football because people in general can't get enough of football.
- The diving. With all the diving going on around the world, the sport is being ruined from the inside.
- The fans. Such as hooligans. And especially women can't stand men screaming, shouting and crying over football, it seems...
But what good has football given us? For the women, the men stay fit by playing football. On the other hand, football has also given us fat sweaty guys drinking beer at the pub watching a game.
tirsdag 6. januar 2009
Which of the me's is the real me?
Am I the original me when
- being with my girlfriend?
- being with my best friend?
- being with my parents?
- being with my brothers and sister?
- being with my football team?
- being at a party?
...or when being all alone?
Tough question. What about you? When are you the real you in your opinion?
- being with my girlfriend?
- being with my best friend?
- being with my parents?
- being with my brothers and sister?
- being with my football team?
- being at a party?
...or when being all alone?
Tough question. What about you? When are you the real you in your opinion?
Abonner på:
Innlegg (Atom)
